Report of the Finance Committee, dated 24th April 1883, would relating to the vote for Transport of Suspected Cleaver and his wife to England, WA appears to be based on the Assumption that Mr. Cleaver did not retain his right to the return passage allowance, when he was transferred from the Police Force, since the vote is actually recommended on compassionate grounds; and I have to request you to consider with reference to my desp. n. 1350 the question whether his right to pension was not equally forfeited at the time of transfer, on the same grounds as his passage allowance; as it appears from the terms of the agreements made with him, the privileges peculiar to the Police Force would seem to stand or fall together.
It has now been returned to Mr. Cleaver...
However, to follow the exact instructions given and to improve the response to fit the required format (HTML usingfor paragraphs), and to correct and reformat the given text according to the rules:
Report of the Finance Committee, dated 24th April 1883, would relating to the vote for Transport of Suspected Cleaver and his wife to England, WA appears to be based on the Assumption that Mr. Cleaver did not retain his right to the return passage allowance, when he was transferred from the Police Force, since the vote is actually recommended on compassionate grounds; and I have to request you to consider with reference to my desp. n. 1350 the question whether his right to pension was not equally forfeited at the time of transfer, on the same grounds as his passage allowance; as it appears from the terms of the agreements made with him, the privileges peculiar to the Police Force would seem to stand or fall together. It has now been returned to Mr. Cleaver.
Let's correct and simplify the response to directly output the corrected text in HTML format as requested:Report of the Finance Committee, dated 24th April 1883, relating to the vote for transport of suspected Cleaver and his wife to England, WA appears to be based on the assumption that Mr. Cleaver did not retain his right to the return passage allowance when he was transferred from the Police Force, since the vote is actually recommended on compassionate grounds; and I have to request you to consider, with reference to my desp. n. 1350, the question whether his right to pension was not equally forfeited at the time of transfer, on the same grounds as his passage allowance; as it appears from the terms of the agreements made with him, the privileges peculiar to the Police Force would seem to stand or fall together. It has now been returned to Mr. Cleaver.
Report of the Finance
Committee, dated 24th
April 1883, would
relating to the vote
Nurigance for Transport of Suspector
Cleaver this wife
to
England, WA appears
to be based on the
Assumption that M.
Cleaver did not
retain his right to
the return passage
allowance, when he
was transferred from
529
the Police Force, since
the vote is why actually
recommended on com -
passinate grounds;
request you
and I have to squire,
to consider
with reference to my
desp. n. 1350
the
2nd mist whether
1
his right to pension
similarter
was not equally for-
affected by hai
feited at the time
transfer, on the
of
I whom it these works; as it passage hensigtrights,
all tams on the word of the agreements made with him, the
peculiar to the Police
would seen to stand
opinal motiones to 9513 here or fold together
have
how been returned to Mr. Cleaver
Muz
え
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.